Old Tin Roof

A little bit of me, and everything else

Design Jam London #3 — Serendipitree

Last week­end I attended a one day UX-fest called Design Jam Lon­don #3.

It was brought to my atten­tion by my col­league Jae Lee , here at For­ward, and with­out his help I wouldn’t have been able to bag a ticket.  There were only 50 tick­ets avail­able, and as they were free, there were a lot of peo­ple keen to get hold on one — thank­fully Jae’s fast mouse-work man­aged to secure me one.

I’ve not been to a work­shop / hack­day type day before, so entered the event won­der­ing what would hap­pen, what type of peo­ple I’d meet, and more impor­tantly what could I con­tribute & learn.

The event was held at the City Uni­ver­sity build­ing just off Northamp­ton Square, near Lon­don, which was thank­fully a nice sunny 15 minute stroll from my apartment.

Johanna intro­duced the day, set out the brief and a few tech details, and got the teams to start work.  We had essen­tially 7 hours or so to take a design chal­lenge and come up with some kind of pro­to­type or at least wire­frames of a product.

Team Waltz

We assigned our­selves into groups based on our skillset, and I found myself in team 3.  There were four of us (left to right in the photo): Adam (@admataz), Steve (@subcide), Jason (@jasonchanoz), and me.

Adam, Steve, Jason, Les

We came up with the team name very quickly — Steve said as we were team 3 with 4 peo­ple, it was like the time sig­na­ture for a waltz: 3/4 — so from that point we were Team Waltz.  This pretty much turned out to be the norm for us for the rest of the day, as we were able to get past the small details and get in to the big issues & work on the brief pretty quickly.

We all brought dif­fer­ent skills to the table, with devel­op­ment, design, and UX all rep­re­sented in pretty equal measures.

The teams were encour­aged to keep track of what they were doing on tum­blr blogs.  I found this to be a great way of doc­u­ment­ing the process, so I tried to write out the dif­fer­ent phases we cov­ered dur­ing the day.

Rather than repeat­ing myself and typ­ing out every­thing we did on the day, here’s the tum­blr blog for our team:

Team Waltz

At the end of the day we held pre­sen­ta­tions to show what we had all man­aged to put together in the time allowed, using the tum­blrs (thank good­ness I’d been typ­ing for most of the day) and any sketches we needed.

I was happy to present our teams work as I was really proud of what we’d achieved, and every­one else was more than happy to let me!

What I learned

As I men­tioned ear­lier, I’ve not done any full time UX work in nearly 2 years, but found to my relief that a lot of the tech­niques I’ve been using for a many years before are still valid.

In the time allot­ted to the prob­lem we were acutely aware that some really use­ful UX tech­niques were impractical.

We really didn’t have time to do any user research, and as such didn’t feel we could build valid per­sonas to base our work on (hence the very rough generic per­sona we created).

We also didn’t really have any time to do any paper pro­to­typ­ing, or any user test­ing of our ideas, rely­ing only on the good bal­ance of peo­ple in our group.

How­ever, even though there were a lot of restric­tions on what tech­niques we were able to use, the team worked really well together, and it rein­forced how much I enjoy work­ing in a team to resolve a com­plex problem.

It was great to see what the other teams were able to achieve in the time too — and to see the var­i­ous tech­niques employed to get to the final result. You can read the other teams tum­blrs: Team 1Team 2Team 4,Team 5Team 6Team 7Team 8Team 9 & Team 10.

I’d def­i­nitely do another one of these UX days, and have now started to look into other UX events that are going on.  I’ve missed the design and user expe­ri­ence part of my work as I’ve been focussing only on front end devel­op­ment for the past 18 months.

Design Jam relit the fire for me!

Ideas of March

Today while catch­ing up with my read­ing on my favourite feed reader I came across a post by Jon Tan. It’s part of a move­ment encour­ag­ing peo­ple to fire up their blogs and try to post more reg­u­larly through­out March and onwards, with a view to pro­mote more thor­ough dis­course online rather than just 140 char­ac­ters in a tweet. Twit­ter is not an enemy to blog­ging, if any­thing it should encour­age more dis­cus­sion, with peo­ple actu­ally writ­ing out what their rea­son­ing is behind their orig­i­nal message.

Chris Shi­flett was the cat­a­lyst for the Ideas of March, and is ask­ing peo­ple to:

  • Write a post called Ideas of March.
  • List some of the rea­sons you like blogs.
  • Pledge to blog more the rest of the month.
  • Share your thoughts on Twit­ter with the #idea­sof­march hashtag.

So, here goes…

Why I love blogs

Over the past 7 years or so, I’ve kept a steady 50–60 blogs in my feed reader, all of which sup­ply me with a vari­ety of infor­ma­tion, enter­tain­ment, and encour­age­ment.  There are a num­ber of rea­sons for this ded­i­ca­tion to these blogs:

  • With­out blogs I wouldn’t have gained the sort of expe­ri­ence, and level of tech­ni­cal knowl­edge that now sup­ports me on a daily basis;
  • It’s great to get someone’s thoughts & rea­son­ing behind a short sta­tus update or a tweet;
  • I’ve often stum­bled across a new blog through a post by some­one I already read, and found some great con­tent I would never have found otherwise;
  • As other peo­ple share their wis­dom, knowl­edge and links, I’ve built up a much bet­ter under­stand­ing of sub­jects that I wouldn’t even know where to start with normally.

My pledge

Almost exactly a year has passed since I wrote the oblig­a­tory first post on this blog.  It was at a time when I needed to update the con­tent and design of this site, mostly to help secure more con­tract work and sup­port my CV with some imparted wis­dom.  Look­ing back, I had great inten­tions and ideas, but never  really ful­filled them, both through apa­thy and not really know­ing what to write.

This should hope­fully encour­age me to write the posts I have planned on a vari­ety of sub­jects, and I’m hop­ing it’ll help me to ratio­nalise a lot of my think­ing.  With­out doubt it’ll also help my writ­ing skills too.

So due to the rea­sons above and (a lot) more, I’m going to try my best to write more, more often, and join in the con­ver­sa­tion where I can.

Shouldn’t we be supporting British?

British Telecom’s lat­est radio and tele­vi­sion advert for their prod­uct BT Infin­ity fea­tures a lovely song called Cor­ner, by a ‘ris­ing US star’; Allie Moss. I wouldn’t have known about the musi­cian if today I’d not heard the full radio advert which is pro­mot­ing a spe­cial per­for­mance she’s putting on soon.

Grrrr…

A part of me was slightly ran­kled enough to tweet that I was unim­pressed that BT were sup­port­ing a ris­ing US artist, when I would have thought it more appro­pri­ate to sup­port ris­ing British tal­ent.  After all, BT stands for British Tele­com, right?

A good friend Rich Knowles, who works for BT, joined in the dis­cus­sion (that I’d only had with myself at this point) and men­tioned that the tune was “a ‘good’ song. And BT works in over 170+ coun­tries” (I’ll get to his Daily Mail com­ment in a moment.)

I already thought the tune was good (if not a lit­tle rem­i­nis­cent of recent tech­nol­ogy adverts like Sony, O2, Orange, Voda­fone, and T-Mobile have used), so the point about being a ‘good’ song was cool.

What I find hard to under­stand is why, when specif­i­cally tar­get­ing a UK audi­ence, BT chose to use a for­eign artist. Surely there are plenty of British musi­cians pro­duc­ing great qual­ity tunes that could have suited the advert just as equally?

It’s not about race or creed

At this point I’ve got to rebut Rich’s com­ment about being ‘Daily Mail’ about it (and Rich if you read this, please don’t take this bit per­son­ally, you just touched a nerve, I still love you mate!).

It seems we’ve slipped into a era where any pos­si­ble chance there is to make some­one feel bad about their opin­ion when it comes to the men­tion of ‘Johnny For­eigner’, that any­one who wants to improve British pride or see British tal­ent get pushed to the front at every oppor­tu­nity is branded some kind of right-wing, BNP sup­port­ing, Daily Mail reader (of which I am none, thank you very much!).

How did it get to be like this?  When did it become such a bad thing being proud of our nation? Have we got to a point where the thought of being proud of your nation has been cap­tured by the nut­ters like Nick Grif­fin, or the Daily “we’re not racist, but it’s the immi­grants fault” Mail, so we’re fright­ened to say so?

More impor­tantly how do we go about re-capturing it and mak­ing it some­thing worth­while again?

I’m not the first to fly the flag on St. George’s day (another note about that will be com­ing soon), but I do like being British, sup­port­ing British where I can, and hope­fully see­ing the coun­try doing well enough to feel proud.

Yes, BT is a global com­pany, but it started as British Tele­com. If they can’t push their ad agen­cies to use British tal­ent when tar­get­ing the Brits, then why should any other global com­pany care when they’re ped­dling their wares here?